Supported by Fastmail
Sponsor: Fastmail

Fast, private email hosting for you or your business. Try Fastmail free for up to 30 days.

Apparently ‘Repudiated’ Is Too Strong a Word for The New York Times Editorial Board

It’s not unusual for headlines to shift over time, but this change for an opinion piece from The New York Times Editorial Board on the outcome of Tuesday’s elections went from incisive to anodyne in a few hours.

The original, as seen early Wednesday morning: “The American People Have Repudiated Trump.” Sharp, active, decisive. Who did what to whom.

Screenshot of a New York Times headline: “The American People Have Repudiated Trump.”
This is a good headline.

A few hours later, it was changed to “Trump Has Met His Match.” Dull, subdued, lifeless. Completely drained of its vitality. No one did anything to Trump; it just happened. Hello, match.

Screenshot of a New York Times headline: “Trump Has Met His Match.”
This is not.

The editorial itself is unafraid to use the word:

The repudiation was broad enough to overcome America’s political polarization. Republicans lost races even in traditionally deep red places, including Kansas, Kentucky, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina and Texas. They lost because many independents and even Republicans consider Mr. Trump’s second term to be a failure.

Why neuter the headline? It’s an opinion piece. Express an opinion.

⚙︎

If you enjoy this curated collection of eclectic ephemera, subscribe by email or follow in RSS to get new posts automatically.

(Follow on Mastodon, Bluesky, or LinkedIn.)

Support the site with a tip if you’d like.